Client Service Policy, Governance & Compliance Framework
1. Purpose and Scope
This policy establishes the governance, compliance, and client service standards of Neurostrat Advisory. It defines how clients are selected, how engagements are governed, and how risks, ethics, and regulatory obligations are managed across all activities in Canada and Québec.
This policy applies to all partners, associates, advisors, and third parties acting on behalf of the firm.
2. Guiding Principles
Our client service approach is anchored in integrity, independence, accountability, and long-term value creation. We are committed to delivering work that is ethically sound, compliant with applicable laws, and aligned with the broader interests of clients, stakeholders, and society.
3. Regulatory and Legal Compliance (Canada & Québec)
We operate in accordance with all applicable federal and provincial regulations, including but not limited to:
Privacy and data protection laws, including the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) and Québec’s Law 25
Anti-corruption, anti-money laundering, and anti-terrorist financing requirements under Canadian law
Applicable tax, corporate, and commercial regulations
Industry-specific regulatory frameworks where relevant
We ensure that all engagements meet legal and regulatory obligations in the jurisdictions in which we operate.
4. Client Selection Framework
We apply a structured and consistent process to evaluate all potential clients and engagements. Client acceptance decisions are based on the following dimensions:
Strategic Alignment
The client’s objectives and mandate must align with our expertise, values, and long-term positioning.
Reputational and Ethical Considerations
We assess the integrity of the client, leadership, and business practices, including potential reputational risks.
Regulatory and Legal Risk
We evaluate exposure to legal, compliance, or jurisdictional risks, including cross-border considerations.
Engagement Impact
We consider the broader implications of the work, including potential societal, environmental, and stakeholder impact.
Operational Feasibility
We assess whether we have the capability, independence, and capacity to deliver effectively.
The firm reserves the right to decline or discontinue engagements that do not meet these criteria.
5. Engagement Governance and Oversight
All client engagements are subject to defined governance protocols:
Clear scoping, contractual agreements, and defined deliverables
Partner-level accountability for engagement quality and outcomes
Escalation mechanisms for high-risk or complex engagements
Periodic internal reviews to ensure alignment with policy and standards
Select engagements may be reviewed by an internal governance or risk committee where additional oversight is required.
6. Risk Management and Compliance Controls
We maintain a proactive risk management approach that includes:
Pre-engagement risk screening
Ongoing monitoring of engagement risks
Documentation and audit trails for key decisions
Internal compliance checks where necessary
Where risks exceed acceptable thresholds, engagements are restructured, escalated, or declined.
7. Confidentiality, Data Protection, and Privacy
We maintain strict controls to protect client information:
Compliance with PIPEDA and Québec Law 25 requirements
Secure handling, storage, and transmission of sensitive data
Confidentiality obligations applicable to all team members
Access controls based on role and necessity
Client data is used solely for the purpose of delivering agreed services.
8. Conflicts of Interest and Independence
We actively identify and manage conflicts of interest:
Pre-engagement conflict checks
Restrictions on serving competing clients in sensitive matters
Disclosure and mitigation protocols where potential conflicts arise
Where conflicts cannot be effectively managed, we decline or withdraw from the engagement.
9. Pro Bono and Non-Profit Engagements
This policy applies equally to pro bono and non-profit work. All such engagements are subject to the same standards of due diligence, risk assessment, and governance as commercial engagements.
10. Professional Standards and Accountability
All team members are expected to:
Adhere to the firm’s Code of Conduct
Complete required compliance and ethics training
Exercise professional judgment and escalate concerns when necessary
Non-compliance with this policy may result in disciplinary action, including termination of engagement or affiliation.
11. Continuous Improvement
We continuously strengthen our governance, risk, and compliance capabilities to reflect evolving regulatory requirements and industry best practices. This ensures that our client service model remains robust, responsible, and future-ready.
12. Policy Governance
This policy is reviewed periodically and updated as required to ensure continued alignment with Canadian and Québec regulatory standards and the firm’s strategic direction.
Addendum 1: Legal & Regulatory Disclaimers
General Disclaimer
This Client Service Policy is intended to outline the governance standards and operating principles of NeuroStrat Advisory. It does not constitute a legally binding obligation, guarantee of service, or commitment to accept or continue any client engagement. All engagements remain subject to formal agreements, applicable laws, and internal approvals.
Regulatory Compliance Disclaimer (Canada & Québec)
Neurostrat Advisory operates in accordance with applicable federal and provincial laws and regulations in Canada, including those specific to Québec. While the firm maintains robust compliance processes, ultimate responsibility for regulatory compliance remains with the client unless explicitly agreed otherwise in writing.
No Legal or Financial Advice Disclaimer
Unless expressly defined within a formal engagement agreement, services provided do not constitute legal, tax, or regulated financial advice. Clients are encouraged to seek independent licensed professionals where required.
Confidentiality and Data Use Disclaimer
All client information is handled in accordance with applicable privacy laws, including PIPEDA and Québec Law 25. While we apply commercially reasonable safeguards, no system can guarantee absolute security. By engaging with Neurostrat Advisory, clients acknowledge and accept standard data handling risks.
Engagement Acceptance and Termination
Neurostrat Advisory reserves the right, at its sole discretion, to decline, suspend, or terminate any engagement where risks, conflicts, legal considerations, or ethical concerns cannot be adequately mitigated.
Addendum 2: Neurostrat Client Evaluation Framework (NCEF)
A proprietary, structured model for client and engagement selection
To ensure consistency, objectivity, and high standards across all engagements, Neurostrat applies the Neurostrat Client Evaluation Framework (NCEF) - a multi-dimensional assessment model embedded into our client acceptance and governance process.
NCEF Dimensions
1. Strategic Fit
Evaluates alignment between the client’s objectives and NeuroStrat’s core capabilities, expertise, and long-term positioning.
Key question: Does this engagement create meaningful, high-impact value consistent with our mandate?
2. Institutional Integrity
Assesses the credibility, governance, and ethical standing of the client organization and its leadership.
Key question: Does the client demonstrate sound governance and responsible business practices?
3. Regulatory & Jurisdictional Risk
Examines exposure to legal, compliance, and cross-border risks, particularly within Canadian and Québec frameworks.
Key question: Are there regulatory complexities or legal risks that could impact delivery or reputation?
4. Impact & Consequence Analysis
Considers broader implications of the engagement, including societal, environmental, and stakeholder impact.
Key question: Could this work create unintended negative consequences?
5. Operational Viability
Evaluates the firm’s ability to deliver effectively, including capacity, expertise, timelines, and independence.
Key question: Can we execute at the level of quality and impact required?
Decision Outcomes
Each engagement is assessed across all five dimensions and classified into one of the following:
Proceed – Fully aligned, acceptable risk profile
Proceed with Conditions – Requires safeguards, controls, or enhanced oversight
Escalate for Review – Requires internal governance or senior review
Decline – Misaligned with values, risk tolerance, or capability
Governance Integration
The NCEF is embedded into:
Pre-engagement screening
Proposal and contracting stages
Ongoing engagement reviews
High-risk or complex cases are escalated to internal leadership for additional scrutiny and decision-making.